Coronial
TASother

Coroner's Finding: Petterwood, Michael Lewis

Deceased

Michael Lewis Petterwood

Demographics

59y, male

Date of death

2019-09-25

Finding date

2020-04-20

Cause of death

atherosclerotic coronary vascular disease

AI-generated summary

Michael Lewis Petterwood, a 59-year-old zinc smelter worker with 32 years at his employer, collapsed suddenly at work and died of atherosclerotic coronary vascular disease. Autopsy revealed severe coronary stenosis (80% of left main/LAD), obesity, and previously undetected chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Seven weeks before death, occupational health screening identified cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, smoking, high cholesterol) with a referral letter for GP follow-up, which he did not pursue. He collapsed during routine work operations and despite immediate CPR by colleagues and paramedics, could not be resuscitated. Comprehensive investigation excluded harmful sulphur dioxide exposure as contributing to death. Clinical lessons: pre-employment screening identified modifiable cardiovascular risk factors; the deceased's failure to follow up with GP advice represents a missed opportunity for risk stratification and potential preventive intervention before acute cardiac event.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • severe coronary artery stenosis (80% of left main and proximal LAD)
  • obesity
  • chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
  • hypertension
  • smoking
  • high cholesterol
  • failure to follow up on occupational health screening recommendations
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —