Airway obstruction due to aspiration occluding a permanent tracheostomy
AI-generated summary
Feryne Gaylene Hunter, aged 75, died from airway obstruction due to aspiration into her permanent tracheostomy. She had a history of subglottic stenosis, asthma, and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with a hiatus hernia. Despite district nursing care three times weekly and two ambulance attendances on 11-12 September 2017, Mrs Hunter consistently refused assessment and hospital transport. Paramedics correctly applied capacity assessment criteria (VIRCA) on both occasions. The coroner found no preventable failures in clinical care or paramedic actions. However, documentation of refusal assessment could have been more comprehensive regarding risks and alternative pathways. The underlying clinical deterioration—coughing up clots, tracheostomy blockages, and progressive unwell state—occurred despite appropriate monitoring and advice to seek help.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
paramedicinegeneral practiceENT surgerygeriatric medicineforensic medicine
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with hiatus hernia
Asthma
Patient refusal of assessment and hospital transport
Likely aspiration of food/gastric contents into tracheostomy
Recent debulking and diathermy procedures with persistent coughing up of clots
Coroner's recommendations
Ambulance Tasmania should rewrite the Refusal of Treatment / Transport Policy with appropriate legal advice to provide simple and clear guidance on how paramedics are to deal with issues relating to capacity, consent and refusal of treatment, particularly in situations of diminished capacity
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.