Coronial
TAShospital

Coroner's Finding: Button, Shirley Gwendoline

Deceased

Shirley Gwendoline Button

Demographics

69y, female

Date of death

2017-11-19

Finding date

2020-04-01

Cause of death

subdural haematoma

AI-generated summary

A 69-year-old woman sustained a head injury from a witnessed fall, striking her head on a brick wall. She lost consciousness, experienced headache, vision problems and vomiting. CT imaging at the emergency department missed a subtle right tentorial subdural haematoma on initial scan, though the radiologist later acknowledged this was difficult to detect. A C3 vertebral fracture was also missed despite being mentioned in the radiological report. The patient's new-onset atrial fibrillation appears to have diverted clinical attention from the significant head trauma. The subdural haematoma expanded with midline shift and herniation, causing deterioration and death 48 hours after injury. While the initial haematoma detection was diagnostically challenging, the missed C3 fracture despite explicit mention in the report represents a concerning care gap with potential for serious harm.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • missed subdural haematoma on initial CT scan
  • missed C3 vertebral fracture despite radiological report
  • atrial fibrillation obscuring focus on trauma
  • inadequate cervical spine immobilisation
  • lack of alternative cervical collar options
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —