left frontal temporal subdural haematoma following closed head injury sustained in a mechanical fall from standing
AI-generated summary
An 87-year-old woman on irreversible anticoagulation suffered a subdural haematoma from a fall. She presented to a community hospital lucid with stable vitals. A CT scan confirmed acute subdural haematoma. The neurosurgical registrar advised observation with repeat imaging in 24 hours rather than urgent transfer. The coroner found this advice incorrect: anticoagulated patients with acute subdural haematoma require urgent neurosurgical transfer to prevent haematoma expansion and brain herniation. The patient's condition deteriorated; she was eventually transferred for emergency surgery but subsequently developed cerebral infarction and died. The coroner recommended all hospitals develop anticoagulation reversal protocols to standardise management of anticoagulated patients with intracranial bleeding.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
subdural haematomacerebral infarctionchronic venous thrombosistype II diabeteshypertension
Procedures
brain surgeryCT scan
Contributing factors
anticoagulation therapy (irreversible)
type II diabetes
hypertension
delayed transfer to neurosurgical facility
incorrect initial advice regarding observation versus urgent transfer
Coroner's recommendations
All hospitals should consider developing a protocol for reversal of anticoagulation in appropriate cases, similar to protocols currently in place in Queensland and NSW health systems
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.