Coronial
TAScommunity

Coroner's Finding: Holmes, David Scott

Deceased

David Scott Holmes

Demographics

51y, male

Date of death

2016-04-07

Finding date

2017-09-08

Cause of death

Hypoxic/ischaemic brain damage following head and chest injuries sustained in a motor vehicle rollover, secondary to cardiac arrhythmia caused by left ventricular hypertrophy or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

AI-generated summary

David Scott Holmes, a 51-year-old truck driver, died from hypoxic-ischaemic brain damage following a truck rollover on 7 April 2016. He suddenly veered off the Midlands Highway near Bagdad, Tasmania, after experiencing a cardiac arrhythmia secondary to left ventricular hypertrophy or possible hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The coroner found he had a sudden heart-related episode causing loss of consciousness, leading to loss of vehicle control and subsequent crash injuries. There was approximately 35 minutes of downtime before resuscitation. The truck was well-maintained and roadworthy. While his brother died of severe coronary artery disease, David's autopsy showed only 30% coronary narrowing but significant left ventricular hypertrophy. The coroner found no systemic failures or preventable elements; the death resulted from an undiagnosed cardiac condition manifesting suddenly during work.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Sudden cardiac arrhythmia from left ventricular hypertrophy or possible hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • Loss of consciousness whilst driving
  • Approximately 35 minutes downtime before resuscitation
  • Undiagnosed cardiac condition
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —