Coronial
TAScommunity

Coroner's Finding: Graham, Dylan Rhys

Deceased

Dylan Rhys Graham

Demographics

24y, male

Date of death

2015-05-24

Finding date

2017-04-10

Cause of death

Coroner unable to determine - likely accidental drowning

AI-generated summary

Dylan Rhys Graham, a 24-year-old male, died between 24-26 May 2015 at Elizabeth Street Pier, Hobart. He attended a private gathering and subsequently a bar (T42) where he consumed significant quantities of alcohol over several hours, becoming noticeably intoxicated. Last seen on CCTV at 8:31pm entering an outdoor smoker's area with two drinks, he was not observed leaving the venue. His body was discovered in the river on 26 May, badly decomposed. Post-mortem examination revealed high blood alcohol levels but could not determine cause of death due to extensive marine scavenging. The most likely scenario is accidental drowning following a fall into the water while severely intoxicated. No evidence of suicide, foul play, or trauma was identified. The case highlights risks associated with severe acute alcohol intoxication in waterfront environments.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Drugs involved

Contributing factors

  • Severe acute alcohol intoxication
  • Lack of supervision or safety oversight in bar setting
  • Waterfront location with unsecured pier access
  • High-risk behaviour while intoxicated
  • Extended consumption of alcohol without food
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —