Coronial
TAShospital

Coroner's Finding: Crosswell, Wendy

Deceased

Wendy Crosswell

Demographics

69y, female

Date of death

2015-12-12

Finding date

2017-06-20

Cause of death

peritonitis due to dislodged percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube

AI-generated summary

A 69-year-old woman with pyelonephritis developed peritonitis and died after a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube became dislodged. The tube dislodgement was suspected on 11 December 2015 when the patient was observed agitated and scratching at her skin. However, the subsequent fluoroscopic examination was incorrectly interpreted as showing the tube in correct position. No antibiotics were given and investigation was not expeditious. The coroner found the care substandard, particularly regarding radiological reporting and failure to act on suspicion of tube displacement. Despite this, the coroner noted the patient was gravely ill with little realistic chance of functional recovery from her underlying pyelonephritis, and therefore concluded the substandard care did not change her probable outcome.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • incorrect radiological interpretation of tube position
  • failure to detect tube dislodgement despite clinical suspicion
  • lack of expeditious radiological examination
  • absence of antibiotic coverage despite suspicion of displacement
  • poor clinical management of suspected PEG tube displacement

Coroner's recommendations

  1. More care must be taken in interpreting and reporting upon the results of radiological examination in circumstances where PEG tubes are suspected of being dislodged or wrongly positioned
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —