A 37-year-old woman with major depression and Crohn's disease was admitted to hospital following a suicide attempt. She was discharged after less than two days following clinical improvement, against her husband's reservations. She died by suicide three days later. The coroner found the discharge decision was premature and insufficiently informed. Key failures included: (1) Dr R. did not adequately assess risk by failing to obtain a separate history from the patient's husband before discharge, despite the patient being at an isolated rural location with four young children requiring her care; (2) the diagnosis should have been major depression rather than adjustment disorder, elevating suicide risk; (3) the transfer of care form to the Crisis Assessment and Treatment team was not sent, preventing timely community follow-up within 48 hours that might have identified clinical deterioration the following day.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
isolation of family home and limited access to immediate support
Coroner's recommendations
The Department of Psychiatry should urgently review its processes with the aim of implementing a new process which guarantees the timely delivery of transfer of care documentation to the CAT team and its receipt, with times of sending and receipt being recorded and a cross-check in place before the patient exits the Department.
The rules around discharge notification to the patient's general practitioner should be re-assessed to ensure the general practitioner receives a copy of the discharge notification either prior to their next consultation with the patient or within seven days of discharge, whichever is the earlier.
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —