Coronial
TAShospital

Coroner's Finding: Mr P

Deceased

Mr P

Demographics

64y, male

Date of death

2012-10

Finding date

2016-06-27

Cause of death

Small bowel infarction due to a volvulus owing to adhesions in the small intestine

AI-generated summary

Mr P, aged 64, presented to Royal Hobart Hospital's Emergency Department in October 2012 with severe central abdominal pain. The ED consultant diagnosed bowel obstruction but failed to consider critical complications such as strangulation, perforation, and peritonitis. Upon admission to the ward, a surgical registrar identified signs of complicated obstruction but either failed to understand or did not appropriately act on these critical findings. The cause of death was small bowel infarction due to volvulus from pre-existing adhesions. The coroner found the standard of care fell well below acceptable standards and that the condition was "eminently survivable" with proper diagnosis and treatment. This represents a preventable death caused by diagnostic failure and inadequate clinical assessment.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Failure to diagnose complicated small bowel obstruction in Emergency Department
  • Failure to consider complications including strangulation, perforation, and peritonitis
  • Surgical registrar identified signs of complications but failed to act appropriately
  • Inadequate clinical assessment and documentation
  • Poor communication and handover between Emergency Department and ward
  • Prior abdominal surgeries (appendectomy 2005, hernia repair 2008) resulting in adhesions
  • Absence of vital signs and physical examination in admission assessment
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —