Coroner's Finding: Barnes, Deearne Joan
Deceased
Deearne Joan Barnes
Demographics
53y, female
Date of death
2010-12
Finding date
2016-05-25
Cause of death
mixed prescription drug toxicity
AI-generated summary
Deearne Joan Barnes, a 53-year-old woman with complex psychiatric history including depression, OCD, substance abuse disorder, and chronic non-cancer pain, died from mixed prescription drug toxicity involving venlafaxine, methadone, amitriptyline, quetiapine, and diazepam. Her treating psychiatrist, Dr L., failed to comply with mandatory prescribing conditions requiring daily pharmacy dispensing of methadone, did not conduct adequate risk assessment despite documented prior overdoses and medication misuse, and inappropriately continued polypharmacy with multiple CNS depressants. Critical clinical failures included failure to involve addiction medicine and pain management specialists, inadequate consideration of loss of opioid tolerance when reintroducing methadone after a break, and permitting unsupervised self-management of medications despite clear evidence of misuse. The coroner found the prescribing regime was arguably avoidable given the patient's history and the clear risks of the drug combination.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Error types
Drugs involved
Clinical conditions
Procedures
Contributing factors
- Failure to comply with mandatory prescribing conditions for methadone
- Inadequate risk assessment despite documented substance abuse and prior overdoses
- Inappropriate continuation of polypharmacy with multiple CNS depressants
- Failure to involve addiction medicine and pain management specialists
- Loss of methadone tolerance not addressed during reintroduction
- Permitting unsupervised self-management of medications despite documented misuse
- Significant coronary artery atherosclerosis
- Inadequate monitoring and review of medication regime
Coroner's recommendations
- Government and medical professional bodies ensure prescribers understand current scientific evidence on opioid risks, limited effectiveness for chronic non-cancer pain, tolerance development, different pain mechanisms, risks of chemical coping and abuse, comorbidity complications, and require risk-benefit assessment before prescribing
- Primary prescribers be provided with support including: coordinated and integrated pain management systems, multidisciplinary support options, appropriate time recognition in Medicare costing for CNCP consultations, funding models for multidisciplinary support, and professional development in managing demanding and chemical coping patients
- Prescribers and patients be informed that opioid pharmacotherapy cannot be the core component of chronic non-cancer pain management
- In implementing White Paper recommendations, early determination be made of required qualifications, experience and competence for 'specialist medical practitioner with sub-speciality training in pain management'
- Any coordinated pain management model ensure Alcohol and Drug Services is structured to provide clinical guidance and assistance on addiction issues to hospitals, persistent pain services, primary prescribers, and the Pharmaceutical Services Branch
- Continuation of funding for employment of pain management and addiction medicine specialists, with consideration given to suitably qualified nurse practitioners to fill current and projected needs
- Government assist medical professional bodies in educating the general community on current scientific knowledge regarding limited role and benefits of opioid medication for chronic non-cancer pain and concurrent risks, highlighting benefits of multidisciplinary approach
- Medical professional bodies highlight to members the dangers of polypharmacy and ensure medication is prescribed appropriately in context of total medication exposure, with regular review of medication regimes to ensure safety
- Pharmaceutical Services Branch Protocol for Opioid Prescribing (2009) be revised to reflect current state of scientific knowledge concerning opioid prescribing
- To address continued inappropriate opioid prescribing for chronic non-cancer pain: limit prescribing to patients engaged with multidisciplinary pain management programs; limit prescribing to those with access to and using DORA; remove prescribing rights from practitioners not conforming to safe practice; provide additional Pharmaceutical Services Branch resources; and develop protocol for assessment and intervention of inappropriate prescribing
- Government work with appropriate medical and allied health specialists to implement recommendations from the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (2012) Review of Opioid Prescribing in Tasmania: A Blueprint for the Future
- Future coronial investigations relating to combined drug toxicity should assess: whether prescribing was appropriate and safe; whether consideration was given to adverse effects of individual drugs, cumulative effects, and drug interactions; and whether fatal outcome was likely and avoidable
- Government and medical professional bodies objectively assess efficacy of quetiapine when used off-label, and consider making it reportable under section 59E for drug-dependent patients given limited evidence and increased involvement in fatal overdoses
- Complete and introduce revised application for authority to prescribe opioid medication without delay, with necessary resources provided to support implementation
- Consider standardization of terminology and definitions used in reporting misuse of prescribed medication, including terms such as addiction, substance abuse, dependence, and drug seeking, to improve consistency among health professionals and research
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —