Coroner's Finding: J
Demographics
4y, male
Date of death
2014-04
Finding date
2015-10-01
Cause of death
drowning in a swimming pool
AI-generated summary
A 4-year-old boy drowned in an unfenced backyard swimming pool after climbing onto the pool cover and falling through a 400mm hole. The child was unable to swim and disliked water. The pool, installed in 1984, predated Tasmania's 1994 pool fencing regulations and was therefore not required to be fenced. The solar dome cover, while providing some impediment, is not a safety device and cannot substitute for proper fencing. The coroner found that appropriate fencing would have prevented this death. Key clinical lesson: pools present significant drowning risks to young children, particularly non-swimmers. Prevention through proper barriers and constant supervision is essential. The coroner recommended immediate regulatory reform to require all domestic pools, regardless of installation date, to comply with Australian safety standards for pool fencing.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Clinical conditions
Procedures
Contributing factors
- pool not fenced
- pool cover with hole (400mm diameter)
- child unable to swim
- child disliked water
- inadequate supervision
- unfenced pool predated 1994 safety regulations
- solar dome cover not a safety device
Coroner's recommendations
- Immediate steps be taken by appropriate authorities to enact a regulatory regime to ensure all domestic pools, irrespective of when they were constructed or installed, comply with the applicable Australian Standard
- Warning that a solar dome is not a substitute for a properly constructed safety fence
Full text
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —