Coroner's Finding: Morgan, Matthew Kim
Deceased
Matthew Kim Morgan
Demographics
24y, male
Date of death
2017-10-21
Finding date
2026-06-26
Cause of death
Gunshot wounds to the chest
AI-generated summary
Matthew Morgan, aged 24, was fatally shot by a SAPOL STAR Operations marksman on 21 October 2017 during a siege at the Tollgate Motel. The incident began when Morgan evaded police after striking Senior Constable Solowij with a van. Located at the Tollgate Motel with a shotgun, he barricaded himself, claiming a hostage. Over 48 minutes, he fired shots, set fires, and made threats. The coroner found police made an inadequate risk assessment because critical intelligence about Morgan's Queensland history—including an alleged 2015 firearm incident—was not properly accessed or shared by operational leaders. Morgan was profoundly intoxicated by methylamphetamine and had significant mental health issues. While the coroner found the use of lethal force reasonable given circumstances, the incident could have been managed more safely with proper information sharing. No recommendations were made.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- Inadequate risk assessment by police
- Failure to access and share critical intelligence regarding Queensland history and alleged 2015 firearm incident
- Methylamphetamine intoxication affecting judgment and behavior
- Antisocial personality disorder
- Mental health history including suicidal ideation
- System failures in intelligence management across multiple databases
- Information transfer failures between police shifts
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —