Coroner's Finding: Griffin, Chrisopher James
Deceased
Christopher James Griffin
Demographics
65y, male
Date of death
2023-04-16
Finding date
2026-10-13
Cause of death
Strychnine toxicity
AI-generated summary
Christopher Griffin, aged 65, died from strychnine poisoning at his home in South Australia. He had experienced progressive cognitive decline over five years (suspected Lewy Body or semantic dementia, though neuropathology found no dementia pathology). For years, he expressed his intention to end his life before entering aged care, a fear arising from witnessing his wife's deterioration from dementia. A care worker appropriately reported his acute suicidal plan to emergency services. Paramedics responded promptly with appropriate safety precautions given the reported poison risk. The coroner found no deficiencies in the emergency response and made no recommendations. The case illustrates ethical challenges in supporting an autonomous adult with declining capacity who has made a clear decision about end of life.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- Progressive cognitive decline (suspected Lewy Body or semantic dementia)
- Fear of entering aged care facility
- Witnessing wife's deterioration from dementia
- Post-traumatic stress disorder
- Long-standing possession of strychnine
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; where a court PDF has technically defective redaction, the hidden text is removed from our archived copy and the full text is withheld. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —