Coroner's Finding: Evans, Caleb
Deceased
Caleb Evans
Demographics
<1y, male
Date of death
2018-11-30
Finding date
2024-06-28
Cause of death
unascertained, in an unsafe sleeping environment, on a background of respiratory tract infection
AI-generated summary
Baby Caleb, aged 2 months, died on 30 November 2018 in an unsafe sleeping environment while his mother co-slept with him on a fold-out sofa in a squalid home. He had a concurrent respiratory tract infection. The coroner found his death was unascertained but potentially preventable. Critical failures included: DCP's closure of screened-in notifications without action due to resource shortages, breaching statutory obligations; failure to act on a 20 November 2018 notification that would likely have revealed the unsafe environment; inadequate assessment of Ms Evans' parenting capacity; failure to ensure CaFHS engagement; and failure to track Ms Evans' subsequent infant. Had DCP visited following the final notification, baby Caleb would likely have been removed and placed in safe sleeping conditions, potentially preventing his death.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Error types
Contributing factors
- unsafe sleeping environment - co-sleeping on fold-out sofa with mother
- inadequate DCP response to notifications
- failure to action screened-in notification of 20 November 2018
- squalid home environment with poor hygiene
- maternal inability to maintain safe home
- chronic understaffing in DCP Port Pirie office
- closure of notifications without action due to resource constraints
- absence of parenting capacity assessment
- lack of CaFHS engagement due to maternal opt-out
- respiratory tract infection (rhinovirus pneumonia)
- maternal smoking
- gaps in sofa design creating asphyxiation risk
- loose blanket creating entanglement risk
Coroner's recommendations
- That the CYPSA be amended to require a court which finds a parent of a child guilty of an offence against Section 14A of the CLCA to notify both DCP and CaFHS.
- That the CYPSA be amended to require the Minister or Chief Executive of DCP to apply to the Youth Court for an order that a parenting capacity assessment be undertaken when a parent who still has a child or children in their care has been found guilty of an offence against Section 14A of the CLCA.
- That a policy or protocol be developed providing for CaFHS to notify DCP when a parent with a known child protection history opts out of CaFHS involvement with a new infant.
- That a policy or protocol be developed providing for Unborn Child Concern notifications to be shared by DCP with CaFHS.
- That the phasing out of the closure of intakes and files due to lack of resources, as recommended in Recommendation 62 of The Life They Deserve, be completed within 18 months of the date of this finding.
- That after nine months from the date of this finding, no intake be closed due to lack of resources without the specific approval in writing of the Chief Executive of the Department for Child Protection.
- That a policy be developed which identifies the circumstances in which a notifier is to be advised, or not advised, that a notification has been closed with no action (if Recommendation 40 of The Life They Deserve is not to be implemented).
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —