Coroner's Finding: Underwood, Richard
Deceased
Richard Underwood
Demographics
97y, male
Date of death
2019-11-06
Finding date
2022-04-14
Cause of death
respiratory failure attributed to aspiration pneumonia on a background of advanced dementia, fractured neck of femur (surgically repaired), and gastrointestinal tract haemorrhage
AI-generated summary
Richard Underwood, aged 97, died from respiratory failure due to aspiration pneumonia on a background of advanced dementia, a surgically repaired neck of femur fracture, and gastrointestinal haemorrhage. He was admitted to hospital in late September 2019 with behavioural changes and suspected infection, placed under Mental Health Act inpatient treatment orders, and sustained two falls during his hospital stay, including the hip fracture that required surgery on 12 October 2019. His physical decline was marked by poor oral intake, increasing oxygen requirements, and bleeding. By late October, a palliative care pathway was established and his mental health order was revoked. He died on 6 November 2019. The coroner found the circumstances were not suspicious and raised no concerns about his care, making no recommendations.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Drugs involved
Clinical conditions
Procedures
Contributing factors
- advanced dementia
- neck of femur fracture sustained during hospital admission
- gastrointestinal tract haemorrhage
- poor oral intake
- increasing oxygen requirement
- falls during hospitalisation
- behavioural disturbance and agitation requiring mental health assessment
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —