Anthony Lanzafame, a 54-year-old remand prisoner, died by hanging in his single cell at Adelaide Remand Centre on 24 May 2016. He had been on remand for 17 months facing murder charges and was undergoing trial when he died. While he had a history of anxiety and depression managed with olanzapine and mirtazapine, and had expressed suicidal ideation on admission, he had been stable for over a year in single accommodation without incident. Key contributing factors were the availability of a hanging point (sink plumbing) in his cell and the stress of his trial, compounded by forced smoking cessation. The coroner found no departure from standard procedures and concluded suicide could only have been prevented by doubled-up accommodation or elimination of the hanging point. The dominant preventability factor was the presence of the identifiable hanging point itself.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Hanging points should be eliminated from all cells regardless of prisoner risk assessment or accommodation type, particularly in single-occupancy cells, repeating recommendations from previous coronial inquests
Correctional authorities should be mindful that cursory examinations of prisoners for signs of distress upon return from court may not reveal underlying distress or identify risk of self-harm
DCS Standard Operating Procedure 90 should continue to require correctional officers to be vigilant for signs of distress in prisoners returning from court escapes and to escalate concerns appropriately
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —