Coronial
SAhospital

Coroner's Finding: SNIECIKOWSKA Alicja

Deceased

Alicja Sniecikowska

Demographics

68y, female

Date of death

2016-09-01

Finding date

2020-05-21

Cause of death

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

AI-generated summary

Ms Sniecikowska, a 68-year-old Polish-speaking woman with severe COPD, chronic alcoholism, cognitive impairment, and significant social isolation, was admitted to hospital for acute COPD exacerbation on 29 August 2016. Despite multiple interventions including oxygen, nebulised medications, and trials of non-invasive ventilation (BiPAP), she demonstrated poor compliance, refused diagnostic imaging (CTPA), and became increasingly agitated. She was placed on a Level 1 Mental Health Inpatient Treatment Order after refusing escalation of care. Conservative management continued with palliative focus. She died of respiratory failure on 1 September 2016. The coroner found care appropriate and lawful. Clinical lessons include the challenges of managing non-compliant patients with language barriers, cognitive impairment from hypoxia, and the need for early palliative planning when invasive interventions are refused and prognosis is poor.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • acute COPD exacerbation
  • type 2 respiratory failure
  • poor medication compliance
  • active smoking
  • refusal of non-invasive ventilation
  • refusal of diagnostic imaging
  • cognitive impairment secondary to hypoxia and chronic alcohol abuse
  • language barrier
  • social isolation
  • agitation and non-compliance with treatment
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —