Coronial
SAhospital

Coroner's Finding: HAUSLER Christopher Raymond

Deceased

Christopher Raymond Hausler

Demographics

61y, male

Date of death

2018-03-13

Finding date

2020-11-02

Cause of death

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease

AI-generated summary

Christopher Raymond Hausler, a 61-year-old man, died from Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) at the Royal Adelaide Hospital on 13 March 2018 while subject to a Level 2 Inpatient Treatment Order. He presented with rapidly progressive cognitive decline, speech difficulties, and motor dysfunction from November 2017 onwards. Initial assessment by his general practitioner attributed symptoms to work stress; however, subsequent referrals revealed cerebral atrophy on MRI. A neurology referral was arranged, and he was admitted to hospital on 22 February 2018 with severe neuropsychiatric symptoms requiring restraint and one-to-one nursing. Lumbar puncture confirmed sporadic CJD on 8 March 2018. The coroner found that detention was lawful and medical care was appropriate. No deficiencies in care were identified. The case highlights the importance of recognising rapidly progressive neurological syndromes and considering neurodegenerative diseases in the differential diagnosis of acute cognitive decline with behavioural changes.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease
  • Initial diagnostic delay due to attribution of symptoms to work stress
  • Late neurological referral
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —