Coronial
SAother

Coroner's Finding: SAID David Patrick

Deceased

David Patrick Said

Demographics

38y, male

Date of death

2012-04-04

Finding date

2016-06-30

Cause of death

multiple injuries

AI-generated summary

A 38-year-old man with chronic disorganised schizophrenia died from multiple injuries after jumping or falling from a dam wall while under police observation. He had been recently distressed following his family dog's death, which he had stated would trigger suicidal ideation. Police were attempting to detain him under the Mental Health Act when he went over the wall. A case conference three weeks prior had discussed management of his anticipated reaction to the dog's death, with the family preferring home monitoring rather than preventive detention. Police negotiators and specialist tactical officers were present; officers determined they could not safely retrieve him before he jumped. The coroner found police conducted appropriate and compassionate management of an impossible situation. This case highlights the challenges in predicting and preventing suicide in mentally ill patients, even with advance planning and professional involvement.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • chronic disorganised schizophrenia
  • non-compliance with medication
  • death of family dog triggering suicidal ideation
  • ingestion of tranquilisers prescribed for family dog
  • high location making rescue impossible
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —