Coronial
SAhome

Coroner's Finding: BRADLEY Dwayne Scott

Deceased

Dwayne Scott Bradley

Demographics

25y, male

Date of death

2014-07-22

Finding date

2016-08-01

Cause of death

hanging

AI-generated summary

A 25-year-old male on home detention bail died by hanging at his home. He had been on monitored supervision for 17 months awaiting trial on assault charges. His partner reported he became increasingly depressed following the postponement of his District Court trial in April 2014, expressing that 'it would be easier if he died'. He did not seek medical attention for depression, and no formal diagnosis was made. Community corrections officers described him as argumentative and difficult. There was no evidence his unhappiness or stressors were reported to corrections staff. While suicide risk factors were present (prolonged bail, legal uncertainty, isolation, relationship strain, financial stress), no mental health assessment or intervention occurred. The coroner made no recommendations, suggesting preventability was not established.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • prolonged home detention bail (17 months) awaiting trial
  • postponement of District Court trial in April 2014
  • depression and emotional distress
  • social isolation imposed by home detention conditions
  • financial stress and legal fees
  • difficulty obtaining steady work due to bail restrictions
  • relationship strain
  • expressed suicidal ideation in April 2014
  • lack of mental health assessment or intervention
  • no communication to corrections staff of psychological distress
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —