Coronial
SAother

Coroner's Finding: HARDING-ROOTS Jeremy Godfrey

Deceased

Jeremy Godfrey Harding-Roots

Demographics

47y, male

Date of death

2011-07-24

Finding date

2015-06-24

Cause of death

Toxic effects of phosphine gas

AI-generated summary

Jeremy Harding-Roots died from phosphine gas toxicity after deliberately exposing himself to the pesticide fumigant aluminium phosphide (Fumitoxin) during a siege at his former girlfriend's residence. Key clinical and preventive lessons: (1) Police failed to investigate or escalate multiple warning signs of escalating violence and suicide risk despite a history of intimate partner violence, stalking, and explicit suicide threats on June 21 and July 14; (2) The 18 June forced entry into Ms Rankine's unit was misclassified as a minor matter rather than criminal trespass; (3) The 14 July police impersonation incident was handled as an ancillary (intelligence) report rather than a criminal incident report, preventing proper investigation; (4) Multiple opportunities for intervention occurred—particularly after 14 July when phone records could have linked Harding-Roots to the impersonation—yet no investigation occurred; (5) Early mental health and police coordination could have enabled risk stratification, restraining orders, and custody-based intervention during the critical 10-day pre-incident period.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

psychiatrygeneral practiceforensic medicineparamedicinecorrectional health

Error types

diagnosticsystemdelaycommunication

Drugs involved

oxazepamtemazepam

Clinical conditions

depressionanxiety disordersuicidal ideationpoisoning by phosphine gas

Contributing factors

  • Deliberate exposure to Fumitoxin (aluminium phosphide) during a siege situation
  • Severe depression and suicidal ideation
  • Obsessive fixation on former girlfriend after relationship ended
  • Failure of police to properly investigate prior incidents of stalking, forced entry, and impersonation of police
  • Failure to escalate or coordinate multi-agency response despite clear suicide threats and violence risk
  • Mental health management did not include suicide risk assessment despite explicit threats of self-harm
  • Lack of restraining order or protective intervention despite request by former girlfriend
  • Police classification of criminal trespass and impersonation as routine matters rather than serious escalating conduct

Coroner's recommendations

  1. All aspects of domestic violence policing be characterised by a sense of curiosity, questioning and listening, with risk assessment actually applied rather than merely recited as a mantra
  2. In cases not formally characterised as domestic violence but involving similar dynamics, all complaints be referred to officers trained in domestic violence risk assessment, with immediate referral to officers of Sergeant rank or above
  3. SAPOL General Order Domestic Violence definitions of 'Domestic partner' and 'Close personal relationship' be amended to encompass circumstances similar to those between Ms Rankine and Mr Harding-Roots
  4. Police be directed to carefully consider whether complaints in domestic situations involve criminal offences, with investigations into such offences given priority
  5. Endorsement of internal SAPOL recommendations from Sergeant Peter Schar's report relating to minimisation of delay in siege and critical incident response
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.