A 72-year-old woman with terminal metastatic parotid cancer died from intrathecal toxicity of bupivacaine and morphine. She was admitted to Ashford Hospital for pain management of pathological pelvic fractures. An intrathecal catheter was correctly inserted but on 20 September 2010, a senior palliative care physician ordered a bolus dose of 5mg morphine and 3ml bupivacaine, intending epidural administration but the line was intrathecal. These doses were excessive for intrathecal delivery. The patient collapsed within 35 minutes, with profound hypotension (56/32) and respiratory depression. She received naloxone, briefly improved, then deteriorated again and died 4 hours later. The coroner found no alternative anatomical cause. Clinical lessons: verify catheter type before administration, implement enhanced monitoring after intrathecal bolus dosing, clarify resuscitation plans early in dying patients, and involve family in resuscitation decisions when acute medical events occur.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Incorrect identification of catheter type (intrathecal misidentified as epidural)
Excessive bolus dose prescribed for intrathecal administration
Inadequate monitoring following intrathecal bolus administration
Failure to establish formal resuscitation status documentation prior to incident
Lack of consultation with family regarding resuscitation measures
Coroner's recommendations
The General Manager of Ashford Hospital should draw to the attention of all clinical staff the need to closely monitor vital signs of patients to whom intrathecal bolus analgesia has been administered
Implementation of clearer documentation and discussion of resuscitation status for dying patients prior to acute events
Where collapse of a dying patient occurs due to medical misadventure, consultation with family members should occur regarding extent of resuscitative measures to be applied
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.