Andrew David Hollonds, a 37-year-old man with personality disorder, substance misuse, and recent psychosis, presented to hospital after a suicide attempt (temazepam overdose) following job loss. He explicitly threatened hanging to his father. Although detained under the Mental Health Act with documented suicide risk, he was permitted unaccompanied cigarette breaks and subsequently absconded from the Emergency Department. Police located him hanging in his backyard within an hour. Key clinical failures included: inadequate supervision of a detained high-risk patient, permitting unsupervised departures despite explicit suicide threat, and ambiguous protocols regarding Code Black escalation and missing patient procedures. The coroner identified policy gaps around managing detained smokers and recommended clearer guidance on supervision requirements and consideration of alternatives such as nicotine replacement or secure outdoor areas.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
psychiatryemergency medicine
Error types
systemcommunicationprocedural
Drugs involved
temazepamalcoholrisperidoneparoxetine
Clinical conditions
suicidal ideationpersonality disorderpsychosissubstance use disorderacute intoxication
ambiguous Code Black policy not addressing calm departure scenario
tension between Code Black policy and clinical practice manual abscond protocol
lack of security office notification
situational crisis following job loss
personality disorder with impulsive and self-harm traits
Coroner's recommendations
Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse to review existing practices and policies relating to smoking and detained mental health patients to provide clearest possible guidance to staff about when patients are to be accompanied and when they are not when absent from secure premises for a cigarette break
Consider provision of nicotine patches as alternative to cigarette breaks
Consider development of enclosed recreational outdoor courtyard areas connected to ward exits as secure areas allowing unaccompanied access
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.