A 32-year-old man with bipolar disorder and recent suicide attempt died by hanging in a closed psychiatric ward. He was admitted following overdose and suicidal ideation, deemed high-risk, and placed on standard half-hourly observations. Critical admission documentation (risk assessment and nursing assessment) was not completed despite adequate staffing. Staff failed to recognize ongoing suicide risk despite clear clinical indicators including expressed disappointment that overdose failed and statements of being unhappy to live. The coroner found the death preventable, noting that subsequent policy changes implementing 15-minute observations and environmental modifications acknowledge inadequate supervision. Key lessons: complete risk assessments on admission to high-acuity psychiatric units, escalate observation levels when documentation indicates high suicide risk, and ensure handover information translates to appropriate clinical precautions.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
incomplete risk assessment on admission to Ward 5J
incomplete nursing assessment on admission
standard level observations (half-hourly) assigned despite high-risk status
failure to escalate observation level based on clinical indicators
nursing staff misinterpretation of patient's apparent relaxation as indicating low suicide risk
inadequate supervision relative to documented high suicide risk
physical environment allowed patient to access ligature point and lock door
Coroner's recommendations
All Ward 5J patients must be on close observation with observations conducted irregularly every 15 minutes (twice the intensity of previous regime)
Implementation of new risk assessment policy using online CBIS system accessible to all clinical staff without requiring medical notes
Physical environment modifications including reduced bed capacity, CCTV monitoring, and redesigned doors with inner swinging door and ligature-resistant handles
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —