Damian Kay, aged 38, died from multiple injuries after jumping from the 16th floor of a hotel on 22 September 2010, with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.71%. The death occurred in the context of recent relationship breakdown and unresolved grief following the loss of his wife and children in the 2005 Wangary bushfire. Mr Kay presented to the Emergency Department via police after writing a three-page suicide note detailing asset distribution. A junior RMO, Dr N., assessed him after only 10-15 minutes without reading the suicide note, without utilising available collateral history including a prior suicide attempt, and without consulting senior colleagues despite these resources being readily available. The coroner found multiple significant clinical omissions contributed to his discharge without appropriate mental health follow-up or detention, resulting in preventable loss of life within hours.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Inadequate psychiatric risk assessment in Emergency Department
Failure to read and review suicide note despite awareness of its existence
Failure to obtain collateral history including prior suicide attempt
Lack of consultation with senior medical colleagues
Failure to utilise available mental health nursing support
Failure to arrange follow-up care or crisis response
Recent relationship breakdown and infidelity
Unresolved grief from loss of wife and children in bushfire
Alcohol consumption and dependence
Recent cessation of antidepressant medication
Previous suicide attempt via overdose 8 months prior to psychiatrist consultation
Coroner's recommendations
Department of Health should ensure that training in the assessment of suicidal risk should be provided both to medical undergraduates and to doctors working in Emergency Departments
A junior doctor or a mental health nurse should not discharge a suicidal patient, particularly one brought in by police under section 57(1)(c) of the Mental Health Act 2009, from an Emergency Department without having sought advice from a senior medical colleague - either an Emergency Department senior registrar or consultant, or a psychiatric registrar or consultant on-call
A minimum set of information should be obtained before discharging a suicidal patient from the Emergency Department, with information obtained from family members and current treatment doctors or other therapists where possible
There should be assertive follow-up of suicidal patients offered by community mental health services with expectations about timely face to face follow-up and routine offering of follow-up with community mental health teams being assertive and persistent in attempts to see patients face to face
SAPOL to include in annual Incident Management and Operational Safety Training (IMOST) the need to volunteer the best form of information available (such as suicide notes) to medical authorities making Mental Health Detention assessments
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —