multiple injuries sustained when struck by a multi-tyred road roller
AI-generated summary
A 50-year-old road worker was struck and killed by a multi-tyred roller he was operating while reversing during road spray-sealing work. The driver made steering errors while reversing—the primary human factors being: unfamiliarity with the specific roller model (DM83), which lacked a foot brake unlike his previous equipment; hydraulic steering lag causing delayed correction; and critically, the unsafe operational practice requiring drivers to reverse for half their working day while twisted looking over their shoulder. When the roller drifted off course, the driver attempted to brake using a non-existent foot brake rather than lifting off the deadman's plate. This tragic accident highlights systemic workplace design failures. Enhanced operator familiarisation, machine design improvements enabling forward-facing operation during reversing, and engineering solutions to eliminate the need for prolonged reversing manoeuvres could have prevented this death.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
operator fatigue after 6-7 hours operation including 3+ hours reversing
deceased worker in unexpected location due to roller's sudden course change
Coroner's recommendations
Minister for Transport and Infrastructure and Minister for Industrial Relations should jointly develop a strategy to overcome the unsafe method of roller operation, in consultation with interstate and Federal counterparts
Implement machine designs enabling operators to face forward while vehicle reverses, to eliminate the need for twisted posture while reversing
Consider engineering solutions to reduce or eliminate the requirement for operators to reverse rollers for extended periods during road surface compaction work
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —