Coronial
SAcommunity

Coroner's Finding: WANGANEEN Derrick Terence Lee

Deceased

Derrick Terence Lee Wanganeen

Demographics

24y, male

Date of death

2009-05-06

Finding date

2011-02-17

Cause of death

upper cervical spinal crush injury due to motor vehicle accident

AI-generated summary

A 24-year-old male died from upper cervical spinal crush injury sustained in a high-speed motor vehicle crash while evading police. He had stolen a vehicle and drove recklessly at speeds of 160-220 km/h, significantly impaired by a combination of alcohol (0.064%), diazepam, and cannabis. Expert evidence confirmed this drug combination substantially impaired driving ability, increasing risk-taking behaviour and reducing vehicle control. The coroner found the police pursuit was appropriate and brief (50 seconds), with minimal effect on the fatal outcome. The death resulted from the deceased's own reckless driving while intoxicated and impaired, not police actions. Key lesson: substance-impaired drivers operating vehicles at extreme speeds pose catastrophic public safety risks.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • reckless high-speed driving
  • alcohol intoxication
  • diazepam use
  • cannabis use
  • combined drug effects impairing judgment and motor control
  • evasion of police
  • vehicle theft
  • no seatbelt worn
  • impaired ability to negotiate road bends at high speed

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Refer to recommendations made in findings for deaths of Rhys Allan Gerard Ryan and Jake Spencer Henschke (Inquest 37/2010)
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —