Coroner's Finding: LANGHANS Doris Merle
Deceased
Doris Merle Langhans
Demographics
89y, female
Date of death
2008-10-26
Finding date
2011-12-07
Cause of death
acute renal failure with severe electrolyte disturbance due to sigmoid volvulus on a background of vascular dementia
AI-generated summary
An 89-year-old woman with severe vascular dementia died from acute renal failure due to sigmoid volvulus while detained under the Mental Health Act. She was admitted to hospital for management of aggressive behaviour secondary to dementia. On 26 October 2008, an intern identified a probable sigmoid volvulus on imaging and arranged surgical review. The patient deteriorated rapidly, became unresponsive, and died during resuscitation attempts. The coroner found detention was lawful and appropriate, with adequate care provided. The death resulted from a surgical emergency (bowel obstruction) in an elderly patient with advanced dementia, underlying vascular disease, and electrolyte disturbance. Early recognition of the volvulus occurred but rapid decompensation prevented intervention.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Contributing factors
- advanced vascular dementia with behavioural disturbance
- sigmoid volvulus
- severe electrolyte disturbance
- rapid clinical deterioration
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —