Coronial
SAcommunity

Coroner's Finding: BRADFORD Steven Michael

Deceased

Steven Michael Bradford

Demographics

20y, male

Date of death

2006-05-23

Finding date

2009-03-06

Cause of death

severe blunt head trauma

AI-generated summary

Steven Bradford, a 20-year-old motorcyclist with a learner's permit, was riding an unregistered Honda CVR 600cc motorcycle illegally at high speed. After speeding on the Lincoln Highway, he was pursued by solo police officer Brevet Sergeant Graham, despite police possessing the registered owner's Tumby Bay address. The pursuit continued at excessive speeds through reducing speed zones (110→80→50 km/h) into the township. Graham maintained speeds of 120 km/h in the 80 km/h zone and remained close to the motorcycle in the 50 km/h zone. Steven, believing pursuit was ongoing, maintained extreme speeds and collided with a 4WD vehicle, sustaining fatal head trauma. The coroner found the pursuit was not justified in the public interest, particularly given the minor traffic offences and availability of alternative investigation methods. Critical failures included inadequate risk assessment, failure to obtain available identifying information, lack of incident controller oversight, and continuation of pursuit when public safety risks were unacceptable.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • police pursuit at excessive speed in speed-restricted zones
  • officer failed to conduct proper risk assessment before and during pursuit
  • officer did not obtain registered owner details available in police records
  • officer pursued motorcycle for traffic offences in areas of public risk
  • motorcycle's high performance capabilities exceeded rider's experience level
  • rider's belief that police were still pursuing him at point of collision
  • lack of incident controller oversight during solo pursuit
  • failure to terminate pursuit when risks outweighed benefits
  • failure to implement alternative investigation methods

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Commissioner of Police establish a panel to investigate appropriateness of pursuing motorcyclists at high speed
  2. Commissioner of Police amend General Order on high risk driving to include circumstances for/against pursuing motorcycles, reference to registered owner identity relevance, reference to alternative investigation powers, and address sole officer pursuit situations
  3. Commissioner of Police devise education programs on amended General Order topics for delivery to all police officers
  4. Government Ministers consider legislation preventing registration of vehicles to persons not licensed to drive that vehicle type
  5. Government Ministers consider legislation making it an offence for registered owner to knowingly permit unlicensed person to operate the vehicle
  6. Government Ministers consider legislation penalising failure to stop when directed by police with minimum licence disqualification served consecutively to other disqualifications
  7. SAPOL request Transport SA re-examine Learner Approved Motorcycle Scheme to restrict learner riders from overly powerful motorcycles
  8. SAPOL approach Transport SA to examine legislation preventing learner riders from purchasing or registering motorcycles they are not permitted to ride
  9. SAPOL approach Transport SA to ensure consistent accredited driver training, testing and licensing across the state
  10. SAPOL require all Sworn and Non-Sworn members in country communication rooms undertake approved SAPOL radio procedures communication course
  11. Port Lincoln Police Station functionality and incident management reviewed by Officer in Charge West Coast Local Service Area, audited by Service Enhancement Branch
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —