Coronial
SAother

Coroner's Finding: GILL Andrew Stephen and SCHAER Simon

Deceased

Andrew Stephen Gill and Simon Schaer

Demographics

26y, male

Date of death

2005-06-02

Finding date

2008-11-28

Cause of death

severe closed head injury associated with severe fractures of the cranial vault and base of the skull and fracture dislocation of the cervical spine (Gill); closed head injury (Schaer)

AI-generated summary

Two remand prisoners died by jumping from mezzanine floors at Adelaide Remand Centre. Andrew Gill (26) died 2 June 2005 after jumping 1 June; Simon Schaer (70) died 15 December 2005. Critical failure: police possessed information about Gill's suicidal ideation (diary entries, family concerns, brother's suicide) but did not communicate this to correctional services. The Prisoner Screening Form's critical sections were not completed, and the information remained with police. Prison health assessments were based on incomplete information. Had Prison Health Service known the full risk profile, Gill would have been placed in high-security observation or infirmary, not the general population unit with access to mezzanine balcony. Systemic failures in inter-agency information transfer prevented appropriate risk stratification. The coroner found preventable lapses in police documentation and communication protocols.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

psychiatryemergency medicinecorrectional healthgeneral practice

Error types

communicationsystemprocedural

Drugs involved

clonazepam

Clinical conditions

suicidal ideationdepressionrelationship breakdownfirst-time prisoner stressgrief and loss

Contributing factors

  • failure of police to communicate suicidal ideation and diary entries to correctional services
  • incomplete Prisoner Screening Form - critical sections not filled out
  • failure to complete Information for Prisoner Escort section of PD331
  • entrenched practice at Elizabeth police station of not completing critical risk assessment sections
  • lack of electronic information-sharing system between SAPOL and DCS
  • placement of high-risk prisoner in general population unit with access to mezzanine balcony
  • insufficient time allocated for medical assessment of newly admitted prisoners
  • lack of formal procedure for family members to report concerns about prisoner welfare
  • architectural design of accommodation units allowing access to mezzanine floors and balconies from which falls were possible
  • no post-Gill directive to staff to monitor mezzanine behaviour

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Establish and maintain ongoing working group between Commissioner of Police, Chief Executive DCS, General Manager ARC, GSL, Courts Administrator, Chief Executive Department of Health, Prison Health Service and Aboriginal community representative to review procedures for transfer of information between custodial entities regarding prisoner self-harm risk
  2. Establish electronic system through Justice Information System or other medium enabling custodial entities to immediately access information concerning prisoner self-harm risk posted by other entities
  3. Continue to develop and improve formal procedures for registration, acknowledgment and action upon expressions of concern for prisoner welfare from families, friends and associates
  4. Commissioner of Police remind members of mandatory nature of General Orders and consequences of departure
  5. Commissioner of Police ensure all custody officers aware of need to continually monitor and document evidence relevant to prisoner self-harm risk
  6. Commissioner of Police remind officers of possible need for psychiatric or medical examination of prisoners whilst in police custody
  7. Enclose mezzanine floors and staircases in accommodation units of Adelaide Remand Centre with bars to ceiling
  8. Apply for funding for mezzanine enclosure with bars to ceiling
  9. Ensure medical practitioners examining newly admitted prisoners afforded more time
  10. Ensure social workers interviewing newly admitted prisoners afforded more time
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.