Coronial
SAcommunity

Coroner's Finding: PHILP Martin John

Deceased

Martin John Philp

Demographics

24y, male

Date of death

2005-09-24

Finding date

2007-05-16

Cause of death

blunt force chest trauma

AI-generated summary

Martin John Philp, 24 years old, died from blunt force chest trauma following a high-speed motorcycle collision on Port Road, Cheltenham. He was riding a 600cc Honda motorcycle (exceeding his licence restriction of 250cc) at approximately 106 km/h when detected by police performing laser speed detection. After being flagged to stop, he accelerated to 160 km/h while evading police, subsequently colliding with a Ford station wagon at estimated 80-100 km/h. Post-mortem toxicology revealed recent marijuana use and traces of ecstasy and methamphetamine. The collision was deemed a death in custody as the motorcyclist was evading police apprehension. The coroner found no fault with police conduct and determined the motorcyclist bore full responsibility for the high-speed evasion that precipitated the fatal collision.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • excessive speed (160 km/h then 80-100 km/h at collision)
  • evasion of police apprehension
  • riding motorcycle exceeding licence restriction (600cc vs 250cc permitted)
  • recent drug use (marijuana, ecstasy, methamphetamine detected)
  • recent acquisition of motorcycle licence (less than 3 months)
  • reckless acceleration and hard braking prior to collision
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —