Coronial
SAother

Coroner's Finding: GREENLAND Daniel Aaron

Deceased

Daniel Aaron Greenland

Demographics

18y, male

Date of death

2003-02-03

Finding date

2006-01-25

Cause of death

Gunshot wound to the head (self-inflicted)

AI-generated summary

Daniel Aaron Greenland, 18 years old, died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head on 3 February 2003 after shooting his stepmother. Evidence shows he attended the shed with pre-formed suicidal intent, writing farewell notes before police arrived. One note referenced hearing voices commanding him to act. Police response was appropriate, timely, and professional. The coroner found police could not have reasonably prevented his death as he had already formed suicidal intent before their arrival. Medical records from childhood documented suspected abuse. The death highlights the importance of identifying psychotic symptoms and early trauma in young people, though retrospectively preventive opportunities were limited once he had already acted violently and fled.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Pre-formed suicidal intent
  • Possible psychotic symptoms (auditory hallucinations)
  • Childhood trauma and alleged abuse
  • Recent legal problems (larceny charge)
  • Motor vehicle debt and financial stress
  • Acute crisis following violent assault on stepmother
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —