incompatible blood transfusion resulting in haemolysis and multi-organ failure complicating an acute myocardial infarction
AI-generated summary
A 90-year-old woman with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock died after receiving an incompatible blood transfusion (A- instead of O+), which caused haemolysis and multi-organ failure. The registered nurse administering the transfusion failed to complete the bedside identity checking procedure, which requires verification of patient identity in the presence of two nurses before commencing transfusion. Although the patient was critically unwell and unlikely to survive regardless, the incompatible transfusion accelerated her death. The hospital subsequently revised its blood transfusion protocol with clearer procedures including mandatory written patient details at the blood fridge and explicit verbal identity confirmation before administration.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
failure to complete bedside identity checking procedure
confusion regarding patient identity after erroneous blood delivery to wrong location
registered nurse overlooked requirement to check patient identity in presence of two nurses
incomplete compliance with hospital blood transfusion protocol
pre-existing critical condition from acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock
Coroner's recommendations
No formal recommendations made under Section 25(2) of the Coroners Act, as the hospital had already developed and implemented a revised blood transfusion procedure effective 1 March 2004 with clearer and more detailed requirements
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.