Coronial
SAother

Coroner's Finding: POTTER Claire Elizabeth

Deceased

Claire Elizabeth Potter

Demographics

26y, female

Date of death

2003-03-07

Finding date

2005-04-11

Cause of death

multiple injuries sustained as a result of being struck by a motor vehicle on the South Eastern Freeway

AI-generated summary

A 26-year-old woman with schizo-affective disorder, detained under the Mental Health Act, absconded from a psychiatric hospital and was fatally struck by a vehicle on a freeway. Clinical concerns include: (1) inadequate psychiatric assessment and monitoring at the Royal Adelaide Hospital between admission (5 March) and transfer (7 March)—only a brief confirmation review occurred over 24+ hours; (2) transfer authorised without personal psychiatric assessment of the patient; (3) poor record-keeping regarding medication administration, making it unclear whether antipsychotics were given despite non-compliance history; (4) late-afternoon transfer timing reducing supervision during vulnerable admission period at receiving hospital; and (5) placement in an open ward despite known absconding history. The coroner accepted that daily psychiatric assessment in acute detention is standard of care, equivalent to intensive care standards. Several systemic improvements were implemented post-incident but monitoring and assessment gaps remain significant.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

psychiatryemergency medicinegeriatric medicine

Error types

communicationsystemdelay

Drugs involved

olanzapinezuclopenthixolsodium valproatebenzodiazepines

Clinical conditions

schizo-affective disorderpsychosisdelusionsmedication non-complianceacute psychiatric illness

Contributing factors

  • inadequate psychiatric assessment and monitoring during Royal Adelaide Hospital admission
  • no psychiatric review for over 24 hours prior to transfer between campuses
  • transfer authorised without personal assessment of patient by responsible psychiatrist
  • unclear medication administration records despite critical importance for non-compliant patient
  • placement in open ward despite documented history of absconding
  • late-afternoon transfer timing reducing resource availability for admission assessment
  • insufficient supervision during admission procedures at Glenside Hospital
  • loss of clinical documentation during inter-campus transfer
  • inadequate hand-over between nursing staff at time of transfer

Coroner's recommendations

  1. The Director, Mental Health Services, should review the Hospital Support Team system at the Adelaide and Glenside Campuses to ensure: (1) patients are adequately supervised and regularly assessed by qualified clinicians; (2) even for inter-campus transfers, adequate transfer planning occurs and patient mental state is assessed prior to transfer; (3) further consideration be given to loss of information during inter-campus medical records transfer; (4) adequate medication records are kept so clinicians know what medications have been administered and when
  2. Detained patients transferred to acute inpatient mental health beds should be observed 15-minutely for minimum 2 hours then reassessed for risk level
  3. Risk Assessment Form should be revised to explicitly comment on risk of absconding and impulsivity and link these to nursing observation category
  4. Royal Adelaide Hospital should consider feasibility of having own ambulance(s) for timely patient transfer
  5. Royal Adelaide Hospital should amalgamate all medical records and documentation across campuses
  6. Mental health patients transferring to Glenside Campus should have medications written up on mental health medication chart prior to transfer
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.