Ascent barotrauma resulting in cerebral arterial gas embolism (CAGE) and drowning
AI-generated summary
A 55-year-old man with undiagnosed viral myocarditis and cardiomegaly died from cerebral arterial gas embolism (CAGE) during a scuba dive at 37 metres depth. Despite being advised by his cardiologist not to dive, he ignored this counsel. His enlarged heart, pulmonary oedema, tight wetsuit, obesity, and poor fitness combined to cause rapid air consumption and hyperinflation of lungs during ascent. He panicked, ascended too rapidly, suffered barotrauma, and lost consciousness. The coroner found the death preventable, emphasising that recreational divers require regular medical examinations by hyperbaric medicine-trained practitioners, with absolute honesty about medical history. Divers with cardiac conditions, obesity, or poor fitness should be counselled against diving.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
diving medicinecardiologyforensic medicinegeneral practice
Error types
diagnosticcommunicationsystem
Clinical conditions
viral myocarditiscardiomegalycardiomyopathy due to hypertensionpulmonary oedemaheart failureobesitycerebral arterial gas embolismascent barotraumahyperinflation of lungsdrowning
Contributing factors
Viral myocarditis with cardiomegaly
Pulmonary oedema due to cardiac insufficiency
Tight wetsuit causing peripheral vasoconstriction and increased cardiac load
Obesity and poor physical fitness
Rapid air consumption due to breathlessness and hyperventilation
Rapid uncontrolled ascent from depth
Breakdown of buddy system safety procedures
Nitrogen narcosis at 37 metres depth
Ignoring medical advice not to dive
Failure of diving medical examination to detect cardiac pathology
Coroner's recommendations
All persons engaged in recreational underwater diving should undergo examination by a registered general medical practitioner trained in hyperbaric medicine on a regular basis, preferably annually but not less frequently than every two years
Medical practitioners should decline to conduct diving medical examinations unless they are appropriately qualified to do so
Medical practitioners conducting such examinations should, if they are not the subject's regular medical practitioner, require the subject to produce a referral letter detailing the subject's medical history as far as it is known
Medical practitioners conducting such examinations should warn the subject that diving is a potentially lethal activity if undertaken by a person with certain medical conditions, and that absolute honesty in providing background medical history is called for
If there is any doubt about the subject's health, the medical practitioner should arrange such follow-up tests as chest X-rays, hypertonic saline tests, or whatever else may be indicated, before passing the subject as fit to dive. Any doubt should be resolved against passing the subject as fit, until such follow-up tests demonstrate fitness to dive
The recreational diving industry should conduct an awareness campaign among its member organisations and the diving public about the dangers of diving with certain medical conditions, the need for regular medical examinations at least every two years, the need for absolute honesty during such examinations, and the responsibility a diver has both personally and to his or her diving colleagues to ensure that he or she is fit to dive
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.