An 8-year-old girl died from severe closed head injuries sustained when a bouncy castle (inflatable amusement structure) was lifted by a sudden whirlwind and collapsed. The child fell from the structure during its flight through the air. Expert engineering evidence revealed fundamental design flaws: the manufacturer's anchorage system used soft pins inadequate for hard ground, forcing operators to improvise with car axles and rope—a modification that severely weakened webbing strength. The structure was designed for wind speeds up to 38.6 km/hr (Force 5 Beaufort) based on poor engineering calculations lacking proper safety margins, gust analysis, and aerodynamic modeling. The actual whirlwind exceeded 100 km/hr. While compliance with manufacturer instructions would not have prevented this tragedy, robust design standards, proper wind-loading testing, and appropriate safety margins could have made the structure safer.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Sudden whirlwind with wind speed estimated at 100-120 km/hr
Inadequate anchorage system design by manufacturer
Soft anchor pins supplied by manufacturer unsuitable for hard ground
Operator modification using car axle half-shafts with rope attachment to compensate for manufacturer-supplied pins
Rope attachment to webbing caused webbing failure through 'choking' mechanism
Poor engineering design process lacking proper safety margins and wind-loading analysis
No dynamic loading or gust wind evaluation in design calculations
Inflatable structure lifting off ground when anchorage webbing failed
Coroner's recommendations
Review Australian Standard AS3533 to establish expected wind conditions including sudden changes that inflatable structures must withstand with appropriate safety margins
Require design of anchorage systems proven capable of withstanding established wind conditions with appropriate safety margin before structures are approved
Require Workplace Services to refuse registration of inflatable structures for commercial use unless they comply with revised standards
Implement wind-velocity testing to establish whether particular systems will cope with required conditions before approval
Establish proper engineering design process that first determines operating conditions, then designs equipment to cope with those conditions multiplied by reasonable safety factor
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —