Coronial
SAcommunity

Coroner's Finding: WANGANEEN Grant Andrew

Deceased

Grant Andrew Wanganeen

Demographics

36y, male

Date of death

2001-02-26

Finding date

2002-10-09

Cause of death

Large calibre gunshot wound to the chest

AI-generated summary

A 36-year-old Aboriginal man died from a gunshot wound to the chest inflicted by police during a confrontation while attempting to enforce a restraining order. After the deceased fled from police, he attacked a police officer (Welch) with a large kitchen knife in the backyard of his sister's house. When the deceased made repeated lunging attacks and transferred the knife to his other hand, the second police officer (Wilsdon) discharged her firearm after repeated warnings. The fatal wound caused a defect in the left ventricle resulting in rapid haemorrhage. The coroner found the shooting justified and necessary to prevent serious injury or death to the police officer. Medical intervention would not have prevented the fatal outcome. No clinical errors were identified; this case involved law enforcement response to an armed confrontation rather than medical care.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Armed confrontation with police
  • Possession of two large kitchen knives
  • Aggressive and violent behaviour during police contact
  • Breach of restraining order
  • Threat to police officer with knife

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Consideration of introduction of TASER weapons for police, with extensive consultation and testing period
  2. Evaluation of protective vests for police officers, noting that adoption is becoming more common though regarded as optional
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —