cardiorespiratory arrest due to massive gastric dilatation with gastric rupture
AI-generated summary
Assunta Petroccia, a 26-year-old woman, died from cardiorespiratory arrest due to massive gastric dilatation with rupture following a bulimic episode. She presented to hospital with severe abdominal pain and was incorrectly diagnosed with constipation by Dr F., the surgical registrar. While the diagnosis of acute gastric dilatation is rare and difficult, a critical radiological report describing 'veiling opacity' suggesting intra-peritoneal fluid was not reviewed by the treating doctor and was available on the hospital computer system he was unaware of. Had this report been read and further imaging pursued, the diagnosis might have been made. The case demonstrates failures in: familiarisation with diagnostic facilities, escalation of unusual presentations, and communication of radiological findings. Had the rare but serious diagnosis been made, more aggressive decompression of the stomach might have been undertaken to prevent rupture, though evidence suggests such treatment would not have been instituted given prevailing surgical knowledge at the time.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
failure to read radiologist's written report describing intra-peritoneal fluid
lack of familiarity with hospital computer system for accessing radiology reports
failure to order chest X-ray
incomplete naso-gastric tube decompression
conservative management approach when more aggressive intervention might have been considered
rare, unusual clinical presentation
underlying eating disorder (bulimia)
Coroner's recommendations
A public warning should be issued bringing awareness to the fact that bulimia can, in rare cases, lead to death if acute gastric dilatation develops
The medical profession should be alerted to the technical aspects of this case so that effective treatment can be instituted if confronted with similar cases
Hospital administration at RAH and all teaching hospitals should ascertain the extent to which medical staff are unaware of available diagnostic facilities and address such shortcomings
RAH should consider whether experienced radiologist or surgeon input might be more readily available for consultation on unusual X-ray findings
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —