Coronial
SAcommunity

Coroner's Finding: FEENEY Nigel Richard

Deceased

Nigel Richard Feeney

Demographics

42y, male

Date of death

1999-10-07

Finding date

2002-05-17

Cause of death

salt water drowning

AI-generated summary

A 42-year-old man drowned at Gunyah Beach while attempting to rescue another adult in difficulty in a rip. Despite resuscitation efforts by bystanders, he could not be revived. The coroner identified inadequate warning signage at the beach as a contributing factor. At the time of death, signage at the park entrance mentioned dangerous seas but the specific turnoff to Gunyah Beach had no hazard warnings. The coroner found the pre-incident risk assessment inadequate for not addressing drowning risks. Post-mortem examination confirmed salt water drowning with no incapacitating injuries or alcohol involvement. The coroner recommended erecting more prominent warning signs at both the park entrance and beach access points, similar to those at nearby Wreck Beach.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • inadequate warning signage at beach entrance
  • inadequate risk assessment by Department of Environment, Heritage and Aboriginal Affairs
  • no signage at specific beach turnoff warning of hazardous conditions
  • rip current conditions
  • attempted rescue of another swimmer in distress

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Erect a similar warning sign to that at Wreck Beach in the Lincoln National Park at the entrance to the Coffin Bay National Park
  2. Erect a similar warning sign to that at Wreck Beach at Gunyah Beach
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —