Coronial
SAcommunity

Coroner's Finding: DAVIES Nicole Memory Faye

Deceased

Nicole Memory Faye Davies

Demographics

17y, female

Date of death

2000-04-04

Finding date

2002-05-23

Cause of death

mixed drug toxicity

AI-generated summary

Nicole Memory Faye Davies, age 17, died on 4 April 2000 from mixed drug toxicity. She enrolled in methadone maintenance with GP Dr T. on 27 March after moving from Melbourne. Dr T. rapidly escalated her dose from 35mg to 70mg in five days without assessing previous psychiatric treatment or heroin history. Nicole was taking benzodiazepines, doxepin, and fluoxetine—creating dangerous CNS depression. On 3 April, the pharmacist correctly identified intoxication but continued dosing after Dr T. approved it. When Nicole presented heavily intoxicated and unable to walk, Dr T. did not hospitalize her. She was sent home and died that night. The coroner found multiple failures: rapid dose escalation, inadequate history assessment, inappropriate dosing of an intoxicated patient, and failure to hospitalize. This case demonstrates critical lessons: methadone induction requires vigilance, treatment history is essential, drug interactions must be recognized, and concerning clinical presentations must trigger appropriate escalation.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • failure to investigate prior psychiatric and drug treatment history
  • rapid and excessive dose escalation of methadone (35mg to 70mg in 5 days)
  • administration of methadone on 3 April 2000 to already intoxicated patient
  • failure to ensure proper monitoring and supervision after discharge
  • co-prescription of multiple CNS depressants (benzodiazepines, doxepin)
  • drug interaction: fluoxetine interference with methadone metabolism
  • benzodiazepine dependence not properly managed
  • previous heroin use

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Dr T. should review his clinical approach to methadone maintenance treatment to ensure it complies with appropriate standards
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —