Coronial
SAhospital

Coroner's Finding: ROACH Dawn Ruth

Deceased

Dawn Ruth Roach

Demographics

45y, female

Date of death

1998-05-22

Finding date

2001-05-04

Cause of death

Multi-organ failure due to septicaemia and peritonitis due to faecal leakage from the large intestine following the failure of a loop colostomy created to deal with a leaking anastomosis following surgery for removal of a carcinoma of the distal sigmoid colon

AI-generated summary

A 45-year-old woman died from multi-organ failure following failure of a loop colostomy created for management of an anastomotic leak after bowel cancer surgery. The initial anastomotic leak (1.5 cm) was contained and reasonably managed conservatively. However, the colostomy performed on 5 May 1998 was poorly constructed: sited in a deep body fold under tension, with an unsuture bridge, and lacking abscess drainage. These deficiencies led to predictable failure. Despite early nursing warning signs (darkening stoma from 6 May), the patient was inappropriately discharged on 11 May 1998 while unwell and unable to manage the stoma. Within one day, the bridge dislodged, the bowel retracted, and catastrophic peritonitis ensued. The clinical lesson is that colostomy complications identified early (days 1-3 post-op) should trigger prompt revision rather than conservative observation, particularly when there are objective signs of compromise. Discharge decisions require senior surgical oversight, not junior trainee discretion, when patients remain unwell.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

colorectal surgerygeneral surgeryintensive caregastroenterology

Error types

proceduralcommunicationsystemdelay

Clinical conditions

carcinoma of distal sigmoid colonanastomotic leakcontained pelvic abscessloop colostomy failurefaecal peritonitissepticaemiamulti-organ failureacute renal failureacute hepatic failurecoagulopathyMRSA infectiontissue necrosissynergistic gangrene

Procedures

colonoscopylaparoscopic sigmoidectomyconversion to open sigmoidectomyanastomosis with staplingloop colostomy formationcolostomy revisionabdominal lavagebowel mobilisationabscess drainagesmall intestine repair

Contributing factors

  • Poorly sited colostomy in deep body fold
  • Colostomy created under tension without abscess drainage
  • Bridge not sutured in place
  • Inadequate surgical technique (transverse incision instead of midline)
  • Failure to revise colostomy despite early warning signs of compromise (darkening, retraction)
  • Inappropriate discharge on 11 May 1998 while patient unwell and unable to self-manage stoma
  • Lack of direct senior surgeon oversight of junior registrar discharge decision
  • Colostomy bridge dislodged post-discharge leading to bowel retraction and catastrophic peritonitis
  • Delayed aggressive surgical intervention after signs of tissue necrosis emerged
  • Inadequate documentation and communication regarding patient's critical condition
  • Non-midline surgical approach during colostomy revision on 13 May limiting abdominal lavage

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Minister for Human Services review clinical practices at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital regarding: the standard of surgical practice performed; the degree of supervision given to surgical trainees; discharge practices and whether bed pressure is affecting these; handovers and exchanges of information; and medical staffing levels
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.