ruptured heart and aorta due to fall from a height
AI-generated summary
A 20-year-old male with newly diagnosed disorganised schizophrenia died by suicide from a fall from the 5th floor of a hospital maternity building while detained under the Mental Health Act. He had been admitted to the Cramond Clinic (an open psychiatric ward) on 9 July 1998 and was classified for 30-minute observation intervals. Although he showed improvement by 24 July, he left the ward undetected around 6.50pm on 25 July. Critical delays occurred: staff did not report him missing to hospital security until approximately 3.5 hours after his disappearance was noted, and the procedure for missing patients lacked clear timelines. The coroner found that an alarm should have been raised to security within 30 minutes of his unaccounted absence, and that the missing persons procedure required urgent amendment to specify escalation timeframes and security notification protocols.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
inadequate and delayed response to patient missing from ward
lack of clear protocol specifying when to notify hospital security of missing detained patients
delay of approximately 3.5 hours before missing persons report initiated
open ward design with limited line of sight to exits
insufficient clarity in medical documentation regarding supervision level requirements after cancellation of leave on 20 July
patient's recent improvement and apparent stability may have led to underestimation of ongoing suicide risk
Coroner's recommendations
The Policy and Procedure Manual for the North West Adelaide Mental Health Service in relation to 'missing clients' be amended to provide specific instruction as to when steps should be taken in relation to a missing client
Hospital security system should be notified at an early juncture when a client is unaccounted for
Consideration be given to how staff at Cramond Unit can monitor ingress and egress to the building since they are unable to keep a visual line of sight over the entrance
Similar clinics designed in future should incorporate principles ensuring staff awareness of who is coming in and out of the building
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.