Coroner's Finding: GRAETZ Anthony Roy
Deceased
Anthony Roy Graetz
Demographics
28y, male
Date of death
1997-04-03
Finding date
2000-03-02
Cause of death
Traumatic brain damage complicating contact .22 calibre gunshot wound to the midline of the forehead
AI-generated summary
Anthony Roy Graetz, aged 28, died from a self-inflicted .22 calibre gunshot wound to the forehead during a police siege at his parents' property in Loxton, South Australia. In the months prior, he had displayed signs of depression, isolation, and increasing agitation following a friend's suicide eight years earlier. On 2 April 1997, he became severely agitated, damaged property, set his car on fire, and threatened to kill himself and others. Police negotiators attempted dialogue but were unsuccessful. After hours of standoff, he shot himself. The coroner found no grounds to criticise police handling, noting they faced an unpredictable, dangerous situation with an individual who had no prior mental health contact and made no meaningful communication possible. Expert psychiatric evidence concluded that even with hindsight, the serious mental state and tragic outcome could not have been avoided.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Clinical conditions
Contributing factors
- depression and emotional distress following friend's suicide
- increasing agitation and isolation in weeks prior to death
- no prior mental health professional contact
- acute intoxication or disturbance on night of incident
- access to loaded firearm
- failure to establish meaningful dialogue with negotiators
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —