Coronial
QLDhospital

Non-inquest findings into the death of RJH

Demographics

70y, female

Date of death

2021-12-27

Finding date

2024-08-13

Cause of death

Heart failure due to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation treated with flecainide cardioversion due to urinary tract infection, against a background of coronary artery atherosclerosis, emphysema, and obesity

AI-generated summary

A 70-year-old woman with complex cardiac history including heart failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and coronary atherosclerosis presented with urinary tract infection and atrial fibrillation on Christmas Day 2021. A locum senior medical officer prescribed intravenous flecainide 300mg total (two 150mg doses) for cardioversion without cardiology consultation, despite recent chest X-ray showing congestive cardiac failure—a documented contraindication to flecainide for decades. Cognitive bias from successful prior flecainide use led to failure to recognise new contraindications. The patient was haemodynamically stable; waiting 24-48 hours for infection control would have been safer. Absent pharmacy cover meant no independent safety review of the unusual dosing and lack of protocol. ECG changes between infusions were not acted upon. Clinical lessons: recognise cognitive bias from prior successes, maintain cardiology consultation for complex cases, utilise available pharmacy consultation services, and review ECG parameters before administering repeat doses.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Inappropriate administration of intravenous flecainide in setting of congestive cardiac failure
  • Cognitive bias (outcome bias) from prior successful use of flecainide two years earlier
  • Failure to consult cardiology despite complex cardiac history
  • Lack of awareness of contraindication to flecainide in heart failure
  • Limited pharmacy coverage over Christmas period with missed opportunity for independent review
  • Lack of local protocol for intravenous flecainide administration
  • Failure to review ECG changes between first and second infusions
  • Prescriptions written for successive administration without reassessment
  • Low potassium and elevated lactate not considered in context of flecainide administration
  • Haemodynamic stability not recognised as reason to defer chemical cardioversion

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Promotion of the large regional hospital's Dispensary Consult Service at the small regional hospital
  2. Development and implementation of a guideline for intravenous flecainide (completed 13 February 2023)
  3. The guideline makes clear intravenous flecainide should be used with caution noting contraindications, adverse effects, and drug interactions; recommends discussion with a cardiologist prior to administration and if a repeat dose is required; carries clear instruction to ensure administration only where cardiac monitoring and cardiorespiratory resuscitation equipment are available; sets out requirements for ECG monitoring and nursing observations
  4. Presentation of this case at Morbidity & Mortality meeting at small regional hospital to discuss potential impact of missed communication between junior and senior medical officers
  5. Medical officer orientation at small regional hospital to continue touching on clinical decision making and escalation for juniors
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —