Doreen Langham: combination of spleen injury and effects of fire; Gary Hely: effects of fire
AI-generated summary
Doreen Langham was killed by her intimate partner Gary Hely in an intimate partner homicide-suicide on 22 February 2021 in Queensland. The death was preceded by extensive domestic violence including physical assaults, coercive control, stalking, and death threats. Despite multiple contacts with Queensland Police Service (QPS) officers and police communications systems between 5 September 2020 and 21 February 2021, police failed to adequately protect her. Key failures included: officers not checking interstate criminal history despite Ms Langham disclosing Mr Hely's previous DV with former partners; misunderstanding the law regarding domestic violence orders; failing to investigate breaches of protection orders; inadequate risk assessment; and insufficient investigation. Police responses were fragmented, with no coordinated case management. A specialist victim-centred police station model staffed by multi-disciplinary teams is recommended as a potential systemic solution. The coroner found the QPS response fell far short of basic expectations.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
inadequate police response to domestic violence complaints
failure to check interstate criminal history
misunderstanding of domestic violence law by police
failure to investigate breaches of domestic violence protection orders
inadequate risk assessment of victim and perpetrator
lack of coordinated case management
insufficient training in domestic violence for police officers
understaffing in police service
lack of information sharing between police officers and services
escalating coercive control and stalking
perpetrator's unaddressed mental health and substance use issues
Coroner's recommendations
Queensland Government provide funding for QPS to trial a specialist victim-centred police station in Logan District staffed by multi-disciplinary teams including police with specialist DV training, DV workers, social workers and legal advisors
Queensland Government provide funding for appropriately qualified DV specialist social worker to be embedded at front counter of every police station in Logan District for 12 months
OPM 9.3.1 be amended to state that officers 'must' view a person's interstate record for every DV matter (currently states 'should')
QPS officers should provide perpetrators with information about counselling, support, parenting and mediation, housing and legal assistance when serving protection orders
Development of specialist victim-centred police stations with embedded DV social workers following the Toowoomba trial model
Mandatory training for police officers in identification of coercive control and risk assessment in DV cases
Development of evidence-based face-to-face training programs (not online learning products only) for all police on DV with annual refresher training
Increased availability and accessibility of perpetrator behaviour change programs and mandatory referrals
Implementation of multi-disciplinary integrated service responses with improved information sharing between police, courts, and DV services
Regular reviews of private DVO applications by police to identify high-risk cases
Implementation of Repeat Calls for Service case management for DV with weekly follow-up
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —