Coronial
QLDhome

Hinder, Nyobi Jade; Hinder, River James & Hinder, Charlie

Deceased

Nyobi Jade Hinder, River Jamie Hinder, Charlie Hinder

Demographics

7y, female

Date of death

2015-07-28

Finding date

2020-03-30

Cause of death

Explosion caused intentionally by Charlie Hinder; children died instantly from blast injuries; Charlie died by suicide via intentional detonation

AI-generated summary

Three deaths resulted from an intentional explosion caused by Charlie Hinder in a caravan containing himself and his two children (ages 4 and 7) during marital separation. Charlie had perpetrated coercive controlling domestic violence against his wife Katherine for years, escalating around separation. Key clinical lessons: recognition that coercive control and psychological abuse without prior physical violence can precede lethal filicide; failure of child safety services to identify specific threats to children; police assessment failure to recognise risk dynamics, treat incidents cumulatively, or conduct formal risk assessment despite visible injury and prior threats; absence of psychological screening for explosives handlers; and systems failure to link domestic violence orders with explosives licensing. The deaths were preventable through earlier intervention, formal risk assessment, and better inter-agency information sharing.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Coercive controlling domestic violence perpetrated by Charlie against Katherine
  • Separation and custody concerns triggering retaliatory paternal filicide
  • Failure of police to conduct formal domestic violence risk assessment on 23 April 2015 despite visible injury and prior threats
  • Failure to link domestic violence order with explosives licensing and security clearance requirements
  • Child safety services failure to adequately assess specific threats to children despite police notification
  • Inadequate security controls at mining operation allowing unauthorised access to commercial explosives
  • Absence of psychological or domestic violence screening for explosives handlers

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Implementation of new Explosives Security Clearance regime requiring suspension/cancellation of licences and authorisations if person becomes subject to domestic violence order, police protection notice or release conditions
  2. Queensland Police Service to notify Explosives Inspectorate if person who is applicant or holder of security clearance becomes subject to domestic violence order, police protection notice or release conditions
  3. Chief Inspector of Explosives to consider applicant's history of domestic violence orders when deciding on explosives licence or authorisation applications
  4. Enhanced training for police on recognition and response to coercive controlling domestic violence, particularly in context of separation and retaliatory filicide risk
  5. Mandatory formal risk assessment procedures in domestic violence matters with cumulative assessment across multiple contacts
  6. Improved inter-agency information sharing and communication between police, child safety services, and explosives licensing authorities
  7. Child safety services to enhance screening for specific threats to children in domestic violence notifications, particularly in context of coercive control
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —