Willersdorf, Maria
Deceased
Maria Aurelia Willersdorf
Demographics
87y, female
Date of death
2015-04-19
Finding date
2020-01-24
Cause of death
Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy secondary to cardiac arrest, with valvular heart disease as antecedent cause. Spinal osteoarthritis (treated) as significant contributing condition.
AI-generated summary
An 87-year-old woman died following a CT-guided epidural injection at a private radiology clinic. Although she had undergone the procedure for spinal pain, the radiologist performed an epidural injection at the T12 level rather than the requested facet joint injections. The patient developed profound hypotension (60/40 mmHg) shortly after the procedure. The treating radiologist failed to recognize the seriousness of her deterioration, provided only minimal fluid resuscitation (50ml saline), left her without adequate supervision, and did not initiate resuscitation despite her showing signs of agonal breathing. She suffered cardiac arrest before ambulance arrival. Expert evidence indicated that aggressive fluid and vasopressor therapy would have had a 90% chance of preventing the cardiac arrest. The death highlights critical failures in post-procedure monitoring, recognition of medical emergencies, and inadequate emergency equipment and staffing at a private radiology practice.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Error types
Drugs involved
Clinical conditions
Procedures
Contributing factors
- epidural injection at T12 level causing hypotension
- profound hypotension (60/40 mmHg)
- failure to recognize serious deterioration
- inadequate fluid resuscitation (50ml saline only)
- failure to provide adequate post-procedure monitoring
- failure to initiate timely resuscitation
- insufficient emergency equipment
- lack of nursing support
- radiologist left patient unattended despite medical emergency
- underlying unrecognized valvular heart disease
Coroner's recommendations
- Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists to amend Standards of Practice within 12 months to require electrocardiography monitoring for spinal tap, epidural and spinal nerve root block procedures where patients have risk factors (age, frailty, comorbidities)
- RANZCR to amend Radiodiagnosis Curriculum within 12 months to require radiologists performing contrast and sedation to hold CPR certification for advanced life support
- IRIS Imaging to implement all recommendations from independent IRIS Imaging Review within 6 months and engage independent reviewer for further assessment within 12 months
- IRIS Imaging to continue thorough patient assessments identifying comorbidities and refer patients with increased risk to emergency department
- IRIS Imaging not perform Type A interventional procedures (spinal tap, epidural, spinal nerve root block) unless: (a) Dr E. completes RANZCR Advanced Life Support and CPR Workshop within 12 months and undertakes annual refresher courses; (b) participates in RANZCR CPD program annually; (c) a nurse is present at all times during procedures and recovery; (d) ECG machines are purchased and utilized in recovery room; (e) all intervention procedure patients remain for 60 minutes with pulse oximetry and ECG monitoring; (f) nurse conducts regular checks and stock audits of resuscitation drugs; (g) defibrillator trolley is located in designated recovery room
Further listening
Coronial podcast — Episode 32The Coronial podcast is an independent production unrelated to this website. Despite sharing the same name, the two projects operate separately and have no editorial connection. The author of coronial.com.au has no input on the content of this podcast.
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —