Coronial
QLDhome

Follent, Mitchell James - Non-inquest findings

Deceased

Mitchell James Follent

Demographics

22y, male

Date of death

2016-08-20

Finding date

2019-11-06

Cause of death

Multiple injuries from fall from height

AI-generated summary

Mitchell Follent, 22, died by fall from a third-floor balcony five days after discharge from his first psychiatric admission for post-ictal/drug-induced psychosis. He had intellectual disability, epilepsy, and acquired brain injury. Critical deficiencies included: inadequate risk assessment despite multiple static risk factors (intellectual disability, history of self-harm ideation, vulnerability); failure to involve primary carer (mother) in discharge planning; lack of comprehensive medical/neurological assessment for organic causes of psychosis; no functional assessment despite inability to self-care; absence of follow-up mental health services post-discharge; medication non-compliance post-discharge with heavy cannabis use (found at scene). The coroner was unable to determine capacity to form suicidal intent given potential psychotic state from medications, cannabis, and post-ictal phenomena. Systemic improvements implemented post-death address discharge planning, documentation, and multidisciplinary communication.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Inadequate risk assessment despite multiple static risk factors
  • Deficient discharge planning and coordination
  • Failure to involve primary carer (mother) in discharge planning
  • Lack of comprehensive medical and neurological assessment for organic causes
  • No functional assessment despite inability to self-care
  • Absence of follow-up mental health services post-discharge
  • Medication non-compliance post-discharge
  • Cannabis use post-discharge
  • No contact with disability support services for collateral information
  • Possible post-ictal psychosis, drug-induced psychosis, or cannabis-related psychosis at time of death

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Mental Health Unit to develop process ensuring comprehensive multidisciplinary discharge plan is developed and documented for all presentations, particularly those with complexity, involving all relevant stakeholders including patient, carers, mental health service, and Acute Care Team where referrals are made
  2. Mental Health Unit to develop process ensuring completion of Consumer Care Review Summary, Consumer End of Care/Discharge Summary, Recovery Plan, Family Support Plan, Personal Safety Plan, follow-up appointments, and copies of relevant documents to key stakeholders are completed at point of discharge
  3. Formal neurological assessment should be undertaken for presentations where organic causes may contribute to altered mental state
  4. Clinical incident reporting processes to be strengthened, particularly for episodes of physical restraint
  5. Falls assessment and management plans to be completed for all fall events
  6. Risk assessment to be comprehensive, documented, and include static, dynamic and protective factors with corresponding management plan
  7. Functional assessments by occupational therapy to inform discharge support requirements
  8. Enhanced communication with family members and disability support services during discharge planning
  9. Verification of patient capacity to manage own medication prior to discharge
  10. Timely follow-up by Acute Care Team post-discharge, particularly for first episode psychosis with new antipsychotic medication
  11. Timely forwarding of discharge summary to GP with specific advice on management of psychosis and new medications
  12. Formal revocation of Involuntary Treatment Orders prior to discharge
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —