Head injury sustained when exiting a moving vehicle
AI-generated summary
A 44-year-old Filipino woman died from head injuries after exiting a moving vehicle travelling at 100 km/h during an episode of domestic violence. Ms Blackmore had reported non-lethal strangulation and threats to police 40 hours before her death, but police did not adequately assess the high-risk situation or take custody of the perpetrator despite him being known to have a history of serious domestic violence. Critical failures included: police not interviewing the motel manager who witnessed threatening behaviour; not referencing the perpetrator's prior strangulation of former partners; failing to provide victim support services or safe accommodation; and not escalating to senior officers. The case demonstrates the importance of recognising non-lethal strangulation as a major homicide risk factor, proper risk assessment alignment with response, support for CALD victims, and cultural competence in police responses to domestic violence.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Prolonged domestic violence with multiple episodes of physical violence and threats over 48 hours
Non-lethal strangulation by intimate partner
Threats to kill the victim
Perpetrator's prior history of domestic violence against multiple former partners including strangulation
Inadequate police risk assessment alignment with response
Police failed to take perpetrator into custody despite high-risk assessment
Police did not interview key witness (motel manager)
Police did not provide victim with refuge or support services
Victim social isolation due to cultural and language factors
Victim's separation anxiety and fear escalated by perpetrator's controlling behaviour
Victim attempted to retrieve belongings without police escort, returning to perpetrator
Perpetrator controlled victim's phone and vehicle
Victim exited vehicle as desperate act of self-preservation while in fear for her life
Coroner's recommendations
Police officers, particularly junior or inexperienced, should be encouraged or mandated to seek advice from senior officers (District Duty Officer) when attending domestic violence incidents
Police should ensure their response aligns with their own risk assessment determinations
Police should take custody of perpetrators where risk assessments indicate this is appropriate
Police should interview all relevant witnesses at the scene of domestic violence incidents, including motel managers and other bystanders
Police should provide referrals to women's shelters and domestic violence help lines as standard practice
Police should offer to escort victims to retrieve belongings or divert them to police stations for safe retrieval
Increased training on non-lethal strangulation as a predictor of homicide risk
Enhanced cultural competence training for police officers working with culturally and linguistically diverse victims
Improved assessment and response to separation-phase domestic violence risks
Implementation of specialist Domestic and Family Violence Coordinators in police communications centres
Enhanced interpreter services and cultural communication support for CALD victims engaging with police and justice system
Greater focus on rehabilitation and behaviour change programs for perpetrators of domestic violence by Queensland Corrective Services
Improved parole and probation supervision protocols for offenders with domestic violence histories
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.