Coronial
QLDhospital

AD - Non-inquest findings

Demographics

75y, male

Date of death

2017-05-06

Finding date

2018-07-09

Cause of death

Multi-organ failure secondary to cardiogenic shock and anterior myocardial infarction

AI-generated summary

A 75-year-old man presented to a tertiary hospital ED with acute anterior STEMI but diagnosis was delayed by approximately 10 hours. The first hospital ECG at 6:47am showed diagnostic ST elevation but was not recognised by ED or cardiology staff. Critical failures included: not carefully comparing sequential pre-hospital and hospital ECGs; failure to escalate despite diagnostic ECG changes; delayed CT aortogram (ordered to exclude dissection); and transfer to the 'cold' zone of ED despite evolving STEMI. PCI was eventually performed >10 hours post-symptom onset, by which time the infarction was very large and complicated by cardiogenic shock and pericardial effusion. The coroner found these delays significantly contributed to death by exposing the patient to much higher mortality rates associated with late reperfusion. Key lessons: clinicians must carefully study all available ECGs including pre-hospital tracings; ECG abnormalities must be immediately escalated; and clinical distractions (possible aortic dissection, arrhythmia) should not prevent recognition of the primary diagnosis.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Delayed diagnosis of STEMI by emergency department staff
  • Delayed diagnosis of STEMI by cardiology staff
  • Failure to carefully compare and study sequential pre-hospital and hospital ECGs
  • Failure to immediately escalate after first hospital ECG showed diagnostic ST elevation
  • Delayed CT aortogram investigation
  • Delayed repeat ECG (requested at 8:50am but performed at 10:52am)
  • Delayed troponin result
  • Transfer to 'cold' zone of ED despite evolving STEMI
  • Very busy emergency department
  • Atypical clinical presentation with features suggestive of alternative diagnoses (aortic dissection, conduction disease)
  • Patient appeared clinically stable and comfortable despite STEMI
  • Approximately 10 hours delay to reperfusion (needle-to-skin at 5:15pm)
  • Large completed anterior myocardial infarction by time of intervention
  • Complications from late reperfusion including cardiogenic shock and pericardial effusion

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Recommendations to the hospital's Safety & Quality Committee for a body of work relating to auditing ECG machines, interpretation of ECG reports and clear escalation processes for abnormal ECG findings
  2. Audit and review of all ECG machines and algorithms with sensitive computerised diagnostic skills, with findings to inform assessment of which ECG machines perform the best reporting formats
  3. Initiation of a new process in the emergency department requiring the most senior medical officer on duty to review every ECG and sign off a stamped template on the ECG with name, signature and written explanation of the importance of any critical abnormal findings
  4. Discussion of whether similar ECG review and sign-off process can be initiated across the hospital
  5. Reinforcement of the importance of clinicians carefully studying all available ECG reports including pre-hospital ECGs
  6. The importance of timely review and escalation of abnormal ECG findings
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —